Monday, April 19, 2010

Does "Fat Free" Mean "Calorie Free"?

Courtesy of: Duke and Diet Fitness

When fat-free and reduced-fat snack foods like cookies and chips flooded the market a few years back, they were heralded as a major advance in the battle against obesity. Not to miss the bandwagon, makers of foods that never contained fats to begin with — like pretzels and gummy bears — proudly added the words "fat free" to their labels.

But soon people began to see that fat-free foods weren't the answer they had been hoping for. Instead, they found that even though they were eating less fat by choosing these foods, they were still eating far too many calories and gaining weight.

One problem was that many people took "fat free" to mean "calorie free." In fact, fat-free foods can contain nearly the same number of calories as the original versions. For example, one brand of reduced-fat sandwich cookies contains 150 calories per serving, while the original version contains 160 calories per serving. That isn't a very significant difference.

Another problem was that many fat-free snacks aren't very filling for their calorie count, so it's easier to eat a lot of calories and still not feel full. Compare how satisfied you'd feel after eating a few fat-free cookies to how you might feel after eating 5 cups of air-popped popcorn or 3 cups of watermelon chunks, for example. All of these portions have the same number of calories — about 150 — but there's a big difference in how "full" you'd feel when you were done.

The bottom line is that there's more to losing weight and keeping it off than just cutting out fat. Remember, fat free is only one part of the story. Don't be deceived. Remember to read labels, count calories, and compare fat-free options with other healthy choices.